TAXONOMIC RELATIONS IN SURAH AR-RAHMAN

Muhammad Iqbal, Novria Grahmayanuri

Abstract


Quran is the guidance from Allah for all the muslims which is contained of prohition and command derived by Arabic Language. All Muslims have not been surely understand with Arabic Language. Thus, there are so many translation of Quran. The most important is the meaning included in Quran should be understood by Muslims. This study analyzes the meaning of Surah Ar-Rahman based on the relations of each elements of word realized in Taxonomic Relations from Martin and Rose (2007). It is analyzed by qualitative data analysis. The data is taken from the Quran Tafsir App by Ibnu Katsir from the verse 1-78. The data of the study are clauses contained taxonomic relations by applied interactive models of Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014). The findings of the analysis found four types of taxonomic relations in Surah Ar-Rahman, included repetition, contrast, class, and member. Repetition is the most frequently type found. It is indicated that this Suroh aims to warn men and jinn for grateful in every favors of Allah.


Keywords


taxonomic relations, quran, surah, ar-rahman

Full Text:

PDF

References


Grahmayanuri, Novria, 2017. Ideational Taxonomic Relations of Hobar on Parpokatan Orja of South Tapanuli, Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL) eISSN: 2548-4613

Halliday, M. A. K., & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, 1999. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.

Halliday, M.A.K. and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen, 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition. London and New York: Routledge.

Lubis, Siti Isma Sari and Siti Khairuna, 2018. Taxonomic Relation in Quran. Atlantis Press. 6th International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT 2018) Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 276

Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

--------------1997. Analysing genre: functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R.

Martin, J. R., & P. R. R. White, 2005. The language of Eevaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martin, J. R., & D. Rose, 2007. Working with Discourse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Continuum.

---------------------------, 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London & Oakville: Equinox.

Miles, B., Matthew, A. Huberman, Michael & Saldafia, Johhny. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: a Methods Sorcebook. Edition 3. New York: SAGE.

Saragih, A. 2017. Variation and Functional Variation of Language. Medan:Unimed Press




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/as.v10i1.1976

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.