EXPERIENTIAL FUNCTION IN ENGLISH ZONE TEXTBOOK

Erwin Ashari

Abstract


The aim of this study was to identify the experiential function aspect found in conversation text. They were Process, Participant and Circumtance. There were five chosen conversation texts then they were broken up into single clauses. They were taken from conversation text or clauses found in conversation text in student’s English text book: English Zone. It was found that the conversation texts were categorized as simple text, because they were dominated by the simple cluase. The most dominant Process were Material Process (36.80 %). and Relational Process, meanwhile for  Participant, the dominant were Attribution (28.22 %), Attribute (19.78%), Goal (17.16%),  Actor (15.30%) and Carrier (14.93%), the dominant Circumtances in conversation texts  were  Location Spatial (28.81%), Manner (22.03%), Location Temporal(20.34%). Based on the findinds, it could be said that the conversation texts in those book refered to the natural conversation. there were three kinds of text found, they were Doing text, Saying text and Being text. The conversation texts were dominated by the Doing and Being texts. Doing text means that the texts were dominated by the Material Process, and Being text means that the texts were dominated by the Verbal Process

Keywords: Process, Participant, Circumtance, Being, Doing, Saying Texts


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashari, E. (2015). Patterns of Coding in Conversation Texts of the English Zone. Anglo-Saxon, 6(8), 39–46. Retrieved from http://journal.unrika.ac.id/index.php/jurnalanglo-saxon/article/view/357

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1994). Qualitative Research in Education: an introduction to the theory and methods. Porto: Porto Editora.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

Dijk, T. A. Van. (1977). Text and Context. London: Longman Linguistics Library.

Fitriana, R., Suhatmady, B., & Setiawan, I. (2016). Students’ Preferences toward Corrective Feedbacks on Students’ Oral Production. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 1(1), 46–60.

Gay, L. R., Millls, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. Pearson Education (Vol. 1). http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Gee, J. P. (2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis; Theory and method (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. . (2007). Language and Education. (J. J. Webster, Ed.), The collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday. (9th ed.). London: Great Britain by Biddies Ltd.,.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. . (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Arnold. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday ’ s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

Kumral, N. (2013). Semiotic analysis of textual communication in Snow by Julia Alvarez. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 9(2), 31–44.

Kurtu, K. (2012). An Inquiry into Connectives and Their Use in Written Discourse. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(1), 110–131.

M.Given, L. (2008). Document analysis. In The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (1st & 2nd ed., p. 1014). SAGE Publications Ltd. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909

McCarthy, M. (2000). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers (10th ed.). London: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.2307/3587181

Meyer, C. F. (2009). Introducing English Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511757822

O’Grady, G. (2010). A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Öztürk, G. (2016). An investigation on the use of oral corrective feedback in Turkish EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies, 12(2), 22–37.

Rickheit, G., & Strohner, H. (2008). Handbook of Communication Competence. (K. Knapp & G. Antos, Eds.) (Volume 1). New York: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Rindu, I., & Ariyanti. (2017). Teacher’s Role in Managing the Class during Teaching and Learning Process. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(1), 83–100. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i1.77

Saragih, A. (2006). Discourse Analysis. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan.

Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved from http://katalog.suub.uni-bremen.de/DB=1/LNG=DU/CMD?ACT=SRCHA&IKT=8000&TRM=77336744* H1 - State and University Library Bremen %5Ct%5Ct%5Ct%5Ct H2 - a sow 065/975 H1 - State and University Library Bremen %5Ct%5Ct%5Ct%5Ct H2 - h sow 065/975a H1 - State a

Zhang, Z. (2008). Discourse Analysis and Cultivation of Conversational Competence in English Class. International Education Studies, 1(3), 60–62.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/anglo.v8i1.991

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.