THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN GOVERNANCE THROUGH ONLINE MEDIA EVALUATION

Suswanta Suswanta, Linayati Lestari, Wiyono Wiyono, Utami Nur

Abstract


As a result of the high value of destructive perceptions of Indonesian government services and the high value of perceptions of corruption in Indonesia, the purpose of this study was to analyse artificial intelligence in Indonesian government governance with the last four-year edition, namely 2018-2022. The research data source reviewed 57 news stories from Indonesian online media. This research data analysis uses the Qualitative Data Software Analysis approach with the NVivo 12 Plus tool and the NCapture feature. The results of the data analysis show that artificial intelligence in Indonesia is seen from four aspects: accountability, transparency, the rule of law, and participation. The results showed that reform and bureaucratic reform from the accountability aspect had the highest percentage, namely 54.55%. Human development and culture from the aspect of participation has a percentage of 33.33%. Ministry of communication and informatics, from law supremacy, has a percentage of 53.85%, and the ministry of health, from the aspect of transparency, has a 21.74%. This study’s findings represent that artificial intelligence systems have efficient and environmentally friendly selling points. However, this research sees that the artificial intelligence system is fundamental and has not been optimised by Indonesian government agencies’ entire scope of work. Even so, it can be seen that the Indonesian government continues to strive for artificial intelligence in the scope of government work so that it is used continuously until people’s satisfaction with the performance of the government system is achieved.

Keywords


Artificial intelligence; Governance; Accountability; Rule of law; Participation; Transparency.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2020). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money and Management, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206

Al Zadjali, H. (2020). Building the right AI governance model in Oman. In C. Y., C. M.A., & S. D. (Eds.), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 116–119). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428516

Alexopoulos, C., Charalabidis, Y., Loutsaris, M. A., & Lachana, Z. (2021). How Blockchain Technology Changes Government: A Systematic Analysis of Applications. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.20210101.oa10

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Baharuddin, T. (2020). Keterbukaan Informasi Publik: Studi Pada Keberhasilan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Luwu Utara 2019. Journal of Governance and Local Politics, 2(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v2i2.133

Binner, H. (2019). Success through certified ita-mes implementation. Fabriksoftware, 24(3), 49–52. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85093955350&partnerID=40&md5=68937e42dfddfe5cbd74c90d309dd664

Bolívar, M. P. R. (2017). Governance Models for the Delivery of Public Services Through the Web 2.0 Technologies: A Political View in Large Spanish Municipalities. Social Science Computer Review, 35(2), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315609919

Brandão, C. (2015). P. Bazeley and K. Jackson, Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(4), 492–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.992750

Brogaard, L., & Helby Petersen, O. (2021). Privatization of Public Services: A Systematic Review of Quality Differences between Public and Private Daycare Providers. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1909619

Chakir, A., Chergui, M., & Andry, J. F. (2020). A Smart Updater IT Governance Platform Based on Artificial Intelligence. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(5), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050507

Chan, D. W. M., Olawumi, T. O., Saka, A. B., & Ekundayo, D. (2022). Comparative analysis of the barriers to smart sustainable practices adoption in the construction industry between Hong Kong and Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2108973

Chang, I. C. C., Jou, S. C., & Chung, M. K. (2021). Provincialising smart urbanism in Taipei: The smart city as a strategy for urban regime transition. Urban Studies, 58(3), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020947908

Cingolani, L. (2021). The survival of open government platforms: Empirical insights from a global sample. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101522

Clifton, J., Fuentes, D. D., & García, G. L. (2020). ICT-enabled co-production of public services: Barriers and enablers. A systematic review. Information Polity, 25(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190122

Criado, J. I., Ruvalcaba-Gómez, E. A., & Valenzuela-Mendoza, R. (2018). Revisiting the open government phenomenon. A meta-analysis of the international literature. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 10(1), 50–81. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v10i1.454

De Classe, T. M., De Araujo, R. M., Xexéo, G. B., & Siqueira, S. W. M. (2021). Public Processes Are Open for Play. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3474879

Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service Revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347

Edwards-Jones, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.866724

Farida, A. (2019). Studi Pustaka tentang Perkembangan Teknologi dan Peningkatan Kepatuhan Pajak: Apakah Berbanding Lurus? Moneter - Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v6i2.6183

Faruqi, U. Al. (2019). Survey Paper : Future Service in Industry 5.0. Jurnal Sistem Cerdas, 02(01), 67–79.

Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530

Filgueiras, F., Flávio, C., & Palotti, P. (2019). Digital Transformation and Public Service Delivery in Brazil. Latin American Policy, 10(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12169

Fox, J., Haight, L., & Palmer-Rubin, B. (2011). Delivering transparency: To what degree does the Mexican government respond to public information requests? Gestion y Politica Publica, 20(1), 3–61. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-82455246611&partnerID=40&md5=840f8ec481248e911f69d3e3005220b4

Fredriksson, A. (2017). Location-allocation of public services – Citizen access, transparency and measurement. A method and evidence from Brazil and Sweden. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 59, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.09.008

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Pardo, T. A. (2020). Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(3), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1734726

Guo, L., & Xu, L. (2021). The effects of digital transformation on firm performance: evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212844

Ike Atikah Ratnamulyani, & Maksudi, B. I. (2018). The role of social media in the improvement of selected participation of students based on students in bogor regency. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 20(2), 154–161.

Ilham Arisaputra, M. (2013). Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance Dalam Penyelenggaraan Reforma Agraria Di Indonesia. Yuridika, 28(2), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i2.1881

Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Sage.

Janssen, M., Matheus, R., Longo, J., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Transparency-by-design as a foundation for open government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-02-2017-0015

Kashyap, A., & Jonjua, M. (2020). Social media-a new digital power to influence voters. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 693–699. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083745033&partnerID=40&md5=4f63edac82a81b58bbb8e4f50f8e8b55

Khadafi, R., Nurmandi, A., Qodir, Z., & Misran. (2022). Hashtag as a new weapon to resist the COVID-19 vaccination policy: a qualitative study of the anti-vaccine movement in Brazil, USA, and Indonesia. Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2022.2042135

Knaus, T. (2020). Technology criticism and data literacy: The case for an augmented understanding of media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(3), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-3-2

Köse, U., Sert, S., Kose, U., & Sert, S. (2016). Intelligent Content Marketing with Artificial Intelligence Related papers Improving cont ent market ing processes wit h t he approaches by art ificial int elligence Ut ku Köse A Soft ware Syst em for Int elligent Mat hemat ical Opt imizat ion of Cont ent .

Kusuma, R. S. (2010). Penggunaan Internet Oleh Dosen Berdasar Gender. Komuniti, VIII(1), 53–63.

Lehrner, S. (2021). Negative campaigning on social media sites: A quantitative analysis of the 2019 austrian national council election campaign. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 7(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA21170011L

Lenderink, B., Boes, J., Halman, J. I. M., Voordijk, H., & Dorée, A. G. (2022). The development of a typology and guideline for selecting innovation-encouraging procurement strategies in civil engineering. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2094898

Lestari, L. (2015). Hubungan Fungsi dan Tata Kerja Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah dengan Bupati menurut Undang undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004. Jurnal Dimensi, 1–14. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=GRvsP6cAAAAJ&hl=id&oi=ao

Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2017). Opportunities and challenges for digital governance in a world of digital participation. Information Polity, 22(2–3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170408

Mabillard, V., & Pasquier, M. (2016). Transparency and trust in government (2007 - 2014): A comparative study. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 9(2), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0015

Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550

Mayston, D. J. (2015). Analysing the effectiveness of public service producers with endogenous resourcing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-014-0428-5

McQuiston, J., & Manoharan, A. P. (2021). E-Government and information technology coursework in public administration programs in Asia. Teaching Public Administration, 39(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420978249

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Nugraini, I., & Ramdhani, N. (2017). Keterampilan Sosial Menjaga Kesejahteraan Psikologis Pengguna Internet. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 183. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.22139

Oehmer, F. (2017). It’s the communication that matters, too! Determinants of interest groups’ media exposure in German newspapers. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 6(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-017-0027-8

Osborne, S. P., Powell, M., Cui, T., & Strokosch, K. (2021). New development: ‘Appreciate–Engage–Facilitate’—The role of public managers in value creation in public service ecosystems. Public Money and Management, 41(8), 668–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1916189

Park-Lee, S. (2020). Contexts of briefing for service design procurements in the Finnish public sector. Design Studies, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.05.002

Perry, J. L. (2007). Democracy and the new public service. American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074006296091

Petrescu, C., & Mihalache, F. (2020). Perceptions towards the quality of public services in Romania. Poor outcomes of public administration reforms? Calitatea Vietii, 31(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.46841/rcv.2020.03.04

Prasetyo, F. & T. &. (2016). Good Corporate Governance Dan Privatisasi. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 8(1), 1–9. http://www.petra.ac.id/~puslit/journals/dir.php?DepartmentID=MAN

Prochazka, F., & Obermaier, M. (2021). Trust through Transparency? How Journalistic Reactions to Media-Critical User Comments Affect Quality Perceptions and Behavior Intentions. Digital Journalism, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2017316

Rakhimova, N., McAslan, D., & Pijawka, D. (2022). Measuring child-friendly cities: developing and piloting an indicator assessment tool for sustainable neighborhood planning. Journal of Urbanism, 00(00), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2022.2111589

Rumbul, R. (2016). Developing transparency through digital means? Examining institutional responses to civic technology in Latin America. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 8(3), 12–31. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i3.439

Ruspina, D. O. (2013). Pengaruh Kinerja Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah, Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah, Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah Terhadap Penerapan Good Governance (Studi empiris pada Pemerintah Kota Padang). Jurnal Akuntansi, September, 1–27.

Sehl, A. (2020). Public service media in a digital media environment: Performance from an audience perspective. Media and Communication, 8(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3141

Solihin, D. (2000). Anti Corruption and Good Governance. … Public Good Governance Bappenas, Jakarta Tidak …. https://www.academia.edu/download/32254157/anti-corruption-and-good-governance-26839.pdf

Sugiono, S. (2020). Industri Konten Digital dalam Perspektif Society 5 . 0 Digital Content Industry in Society 5 . 0 Perspective. 22(2), 175–191.

Suksi, M. (2021). Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09269-x

Susila Wibawa, K. C. (2019). Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Pelayanan Publik sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.218-234

Tyali, S. M. (2017). Public perceptions of the media as a political actor in South Africa: Regarding the Mail & Guardian. Journal of African Media Studies, 9(3), 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams.9.3.547_1

Vinet, L., & Zhedanov, A. (2011). A “missing” family of classical orthogonal polynomials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(8), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201

Winter, J. S., & Davidson, E. (2019). Governance of artificial intelligence and personal health information. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance , 21(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-08-2018-0048

Wiyono, Purnomo, E. P., & Lestari, L. (2023). Culture of Corruption in the Smart Service System of Global Governance. Chinese Public Administration Review, 1 –11. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754231185320

Wiyono, W., Qodir, Z., & Lestari, L. (2023). Online Media Trends on Political Party Sentiment Ahead of the 2024 Election in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 8(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i1.17880

Yasa, A., Suswanta, S., Rafi, M., Rahmanto, F., Setiawan, D., & Iqbal Fadhlurrohman, M. (2021). Penguatan Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Era Society 5.0 di Indonesia. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 20(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v20i1.139

Zainol, Z., Nohuddin, P. N. E., Lee, A. S. H., Ibrahim, N. F., Yee, L. H., & Majid, K. A. (2021). Analysing political candidates’ popularity on social media using POPularity MONitoring (POPMON). SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 2021(Special Issue), 39–55. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85137049186&partnerID=40&md5=47652ef6517bf1f7a81d6736f7fca1c5




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v7i2.5511

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Flag Counter

Web Analytics

View JTP Statistic

 

Office:

Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Riau Kepulauan

unit E

Jl. Pahlawan No. 99, Bukit Tempayan, Batu Aji, Kota Batam

Contact: (0778) 39275

e-mail: jurnaltriaspolitika2017@gmail.com 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

In Cooperation with:                     Powered By: 

   

 

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal Trias Politika (JTP) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.