ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK PERKEMBANGAN PENELITIAN DIGITAL GOVERNANCE

Ryan Anggria Pratama, Azhari Setiawan

Abstract


Abstract: Digital governance has been the subject of research in its evolution. Governments can use digital technology to enable citizens to participate in policy discussions, increase accountability, and improve democratic practices in government. Digital governance is increasingly receiving research attention because it involves managing and using digital technology in government practices. The database used in this research is the Scopus database. The keywords used in writing this scientific article are TITLE-ABS-KEY ("digital governance"). The years used in this article selection were from 2006 to March 2024. Next, inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined to select which articles would be analyzed. After the article has been screened, the next step is to enter the CSV data into the R Studio application. A total of 340 journal articles were published from 2006 to March 2024. This research found that the most published trends were carried out in 2023, with 103 articles and six citations in 2015. Then, second place was in 2017 with five citations, and third place was in 2018 with four citations. Research on digital governance has enormous potential that can be developed further. Areas explored in this research include cyber security, integrating the latest technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and cloud computing into government systems, utilising big data to support better decision-making, and increasing public participation and government transparency through digital platforms. This research provides a comprehensive analysis of trends in digital governance research, particularly highlighting the increasing attention it has received in recent years. For future research, it would be valuable to explore the long-term impacts of digital governance initiatives on public trust and policy outcomes. Additionally, investigating the challenges and barriers to implementing advanced technologies in different governmental contexts could further enrich the understanding of digital governance's potential and limitations.

Abstrak: Tata kelola digital telah menjadi subjek penelitian dalam evolusinya. Pemerintah dapat menggunakan teknologi digital untuk memungkinkan warga berpartisipasi dalam diskusi kebijakan, meningkatkan akuntabilitas, dan meningkatkan praktik demokrasi dalam pemerintahan. Tata kelola digital semakin mendapat perhatian penelitian karena melibatkan pengelolaan dan penggunaan teknologi digital dalam praktik pemerintahan. Basis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah basis data Scopus. Kata kunci yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ilmiah ini adalah TITLE-ABS-KEY (“tata kelola digital”). Tahun yang digunakan dalam pemilihan artikel ini adalah dari tahun 2006 hingga Maret 2024. Selanjutnya ditentukan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi untuk memilih artikel mana yang akan dianalisis. Setelah artikel disaring, langkah selanjutnya adalah memasukkan data CSV ke dalam aplikasi R Studio. Sebanyak 340 artikel jurnal diterbitkan pada tahun 2006 hingga Maret 2024. Penelitian ini menemukan tren publikasi terbanyak dilakukan pada tahun 2023, yakni sebanyak 103 artikel dan enam sitasi pada tahun 2015. Kemudian, tempat kedua adalah pada 2017 dengan lima kutipan, dan tempat ketiga adalah pada 2018 dengan empat kutipan. Penelitian mengenai tata kelola digital (Digital Governance) memiliki potensi yang sangat besar untuk dikembangkan lebih lanjut. Bidang-bidang yang dieksplorasi dalam penelitian ini mencakup keamanan siber, mengintegrasikan teknologi terbaru seperti kecerdasan buatan (AI), blockchain, dan komputasi awan ke dalam sistem pemerintahan, memanfaatkan big data untuk mendukung pengambilan keputusan yang lebih baik, serta meningkatkan partisipasi publik dan transparansi pemerintah melalui platform digital. Penelitian ini menyajikan analisis komprehensif tentang tren dalam penelitian tata kelola digital, khususnya menyoroti meningkatnya perhatian dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Saran untuk penelitian selanjutnya dapat mengeksplorasi dampak jangka panjang inisiatif tata kelola digital terhadap kepercayaan publik dan hasil kebijakan. Selain itu prospek penelitian ke depan dapat mengkaji tantangan dan hambatan penerapan teknologi terbarukan untuk memperkaya pemahaman tentang potensi dan keterbatasan dari tata kelola digital.

Keywords


digital governance; governance; bibliometric analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Addo, A., & Senyo, P. K. (2020). Digitalization and Government Corruption in Developing Countries: Towards a Framework and Research Agenda. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020(1), 16765. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2020.16765abstract

Alvarenga, A. M., Matos, F., Godina, R., & Matias, J. C. O. (2020). Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector. Sustainability, 12(14), 5824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145824

Ananda, R. K., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Publication on Protein Nanoparticle Using VOSviewer. Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro (Diponegoro Medical Journal), 11(6). https://doi.org/10.14710/dmj.v11i6.35942

Baier-Fuentes, H., Merigó, J. M., Amorós, J. E., & Gaviria-Marín, M. (2018). International Entrepreneurship: A Bibliometric Overview. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(2), 385–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0487-y

Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2012). Digitizing Government Interactions With Constituents: An Historical Review of E-Government Research in Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00295

Boța-Avram, C. (2024). Examining the White and Dark Sides of Digitalisation Effects on Corruption: Unveiling Research Patterns and Insights for Future Research. The Journal of Risk Finance, 25(2), 181–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-10-2023-0256

Chen, H. (2023). When Text Mining Meets Science Mapping in the Bibliometric Analysis: A Review and Future Opportunities. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790231222349

Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2023). The AI gambit: leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. AI & SOCIETY, 38(1), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01294-x

Demuyakor, J. (2021). Ghana’s Digitization Initiatives: A Survey of Citizens Perceptions on the Benefits and Challenges to the Utilization of Digital Governance Services. International Journal of Publication and Social Studies, 6(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.135.2021.61.42.55

Dieningrum, A. N. A., Muslihudin, M., & Suyanto, E. (2020). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pemanfaatan Sampah Plastik Menjadi Paving Block Di “Ud. Wong Cilik” Desa Jetis, Kecamatan Kemangkon, Kabupaten Purbalingga. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v9i2.44430

Elizamiharti, E. (2023). Demokrasi Di Era Digital: Tantangan Dan Peluang Dalam Partisipasi Politik. J. Ris. Multidisip. Inov. Tech., 2(01), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.59653/jimat.v2i01.342

García‐Sánchez, I., Rodríguez‐Domínguez, L., & Frías-Aceituno, J.-V. (2013). Evolutions in E‐governance: Evidence From Spanish Local Governments. Environmental Policy and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1622

Goyal, R., Sharma, H., & Sharma, A. (2023). A thorough examination of organizations from an ethical viewpoint: A bibliometric and content analysis of organizational virtuousness studies. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12597

Hasanah, S., Pratama, I. N., Rahmat, A. F., & Kurniawan, C. (2023). Digital Government in Social Sciences Discipline: Mapping Pivotal Features and Proposed Theoretical Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(1), 195. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i1.819

Herdianto, R., Windyaningrum, N., Masruroh, B., & Setiawan, M. A. (2021). Filsafat Pendidikan Dan Perkembangannya: Kajian Bibliometrik Berdasarkan Database Scopus. Belantika Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v4i2.101

Iskandar, A. (2023). Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Hak Dan Kewajiban Pemilih Pemula Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Di Sman 1 Palu. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat, 7(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.30737/jaim.v7i1.5137

Kammerer, K., Göster, M., Reichert, M., & Pryss, R. (2021). Ambalytics: A Scalable and Distributed System Architecture Concept for Bibliometric Network Analyses. Future Internet, 13(8), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13080203

Kawuki, J., Yu, X., & Musa, T. H. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis of Ebola Research Indexed in Web of Science and Scopus (2010-2020). Biomed Research International, 2020, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5476567

Kumar, R., Singh, S., Sidhu, A. S., & Pruncu, C. I. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis of Specific Energy Consumption (SEC) in Machining Operations: A Sustainable Response. Sustainability, 13(10), 5617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105617

Kumar, S., Sureka, R., & Pandey, N. (2020). Forty-Five Years of the International Journal of Social Economics (IJSE): A Bibliometric Overview. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(7), 831–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-08-2019-0492

Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global Gender Disparities in Science. Nature, 504(7479), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a

Lember, V. (2022). Engaging Citizens in Policy Making: The Potential and Challenges of E-Participation. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374362.00006

Liu, F. (2022). A Bibliometric Study of Digital Government in Domestic and Foreign Area. Frontiers in Business Economics and Management, 5(3), 222–226. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v5i3.2024

Magnusson, J., Khisro, J., Björses, M., & Ivarsson, A. (2020). Closeness and Distance: Configurational Practices for Digital Ambidexterity in the Public Sector. Transforming Government People Process and Policy, 15(4), 420–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-02-2020-0030

Mahpudin, M. (2020). Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Adat Baduy Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Representasi Politik: Kepentingan Adat Yang Tersisih. Politicon Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 2(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.15575/politicon.v2i2.9035

Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The Second Wave of Digital-Era Governance: A Quasi-Paradigm for Government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120382. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0382

Mubarrok, U. S., & Rahmawati, Z. (2020). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bank Wakaf. Malia (Terakreditasi). https://doi.org/10.35891/ml.v12i1.1938

Nasifuhan, D., Yang, R., Wang, Y., Guo, Y., Chen, R., Yeerjiang, Y., … Yao, B. (2023). Research on the Current Situation, Influencing Factors and Governance Countermeasures of Public Participation in Citizen Post Station Co-Production under the Background of “Internet + IoT”: an Example of Urban Post Station of Environmental Governance. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 33(1), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/171653

Osifo, O. C. (2018). Examining digital government and public service provision: The case of Finland. 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 1342–1347. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400242

Prabowo, N. (2023). Urgensi Pendidikan Demokrasi Dalam Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat. Edu Society Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v3i1.311

Rahayuningtyas, D., & Setyaningrum, D. (2018). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Dan E-Government Terhadap Korupsi. Ekuitas (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan). https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2017.v1.i4.2597

Rahmanto, A. (2022). Media Sosial Dan Persepsi Publik Tentang Good Governance Pada Pemerintah Daerah Di Solo Raya. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 20(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v20i1.6433

Saimo. (2022). Manajemen Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Organisasi. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 6(4), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.52160/ejmm.v6i4.609

Shenkoya, T. (2022). Can Digital Transformation Improve Transparency and Accountability of Public Governance in Nigeria? Transforming Government People Process and Policy, 17(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-08-2022-0115

Silalahi, O. N. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Kualitas Pupuk Menggunakan Metode Maut. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Triguna Dharma (Jursi Tgd), 2(3), 394. https://doi.org/10.53513/jursi.v2i3.6260

Urbanovics, A., & Sasvári, P. L. (2022). The Status of E-Government Research From a Bibliometric Aspect. Central and Eastern European Edem and Egov Days, 341, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v341.5

Viale, T., Gendron, Y., & Suddaby, R. (2017). From “Mad Men” to “Math Men.” Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(2), 270–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-12-2014-1887

Xue, J., Reniers, G., Li, J., Yang, M., Wu, C., & Gelder, P. v. (2021). A Bibliometric and Visualized Overview for the Evolution of Process Safety and Environmental Protection. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5985. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115985




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/jtp.v8i2.6401

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Flag Counter

Web Analytics

View JTP Statistic

 

Office:

Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Riau Kepulauan

unit E

Jl. Pahlawan No. 99, Bukit Tempayan, Batu Aji, Kota Batam

Contact: (0778) 39275

e-mail: jurnaltriaspolitika2017@gmail.com 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

In Cooperation with:                     Powered By: 

   

 

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal Trias Politika (JTP) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.