Student's Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) of English Language Education Study Program

Aulia Putri, Ribut Wahyu Eriyanti, Ainur Rofieq, Atok Miftachul Hudha

Abstract


This study aimed to identify the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) of students in the English Education Study Program at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Riau Kepulauan. The MAI consists of a self-administered questionnaire, which was administered to English Language Education students at the Faculty of Teaching and Education. This study also aimed to investigate the difference in the Metacognition Awareness levels between freshman and senior students. This study was qualitative research with 116 respondents. This study used cluster sampling which is part of probability sampling. The data were collected by using the MAI questionnaire. After that, the data were analyzed by counting the total score and percentage for each questionnaire sentence. The calculated data were explained part by part to obtain an ideal conclusion. The results exposed that the participants got the highest result in the Regulation of Cognition. For comparing Freshman and Senior Students, the Senior Students got the highest results for both Knowledge about Cognition and Regulation of Cognition.

Keywords


freshman students, metacognitive awareness inventory, senior students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192

Allan, J. L., Sniehotta, F. F., & Johnston, M. (2013). The Best Laid Plans: Planning Skill Determines the Effectiveness of Action Plans and Implementation Intentions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9483-9

Baker, L., Zeliger-Kandasamy, A., & DeWyngaert, L. U. (2014). Neuroimaging Evidence of Comprehension Monitoring. Psychological Topics 23, 1, 167–187. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/178358

Bernanda, L. K. S. (2021). Junior Students’ Self-Regulation Strategies in Dealing with Assignments. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 9(1), Article 1, 30-44. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v9i1.1767

Bessy, M., & Knouse, S. (2020). Metacognition, Metalinguistic Awareness, and Relevance in Language learning: A Report on an Intervention Module Project. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2020.140209

Dolinting, P. P., & Pang, V. (2022). The Classroom Climate, Students’ Mathematics Achievement, Students’ Knowledge of Cognition and Regulation Cognition: A Mediation Analysis. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(6), Article 6, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i6.1533

Doyle, B. (2013). Metacognitive awareness: Impact of a metacognitive intervention in a pre-nursing course. LSU Doctoral Dissertations. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.2644

Fauzi, A., & Sa’diyah, W. (2019). Students’ Metacognitive Skills from the Viewpoint of Answering Biological Questions: Is It Already Good? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), Article 3, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19457

Frolova, A. (2022). Metacognitive Awareness as a Destructive Risk Factor Prevention in Educational Environment. Proceedings of International Forum Teacher Education-2021, Russia, 5, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.5.e0407

Hassan, S., Venkateswaran, S. P., Agarwal, P., & Sulaiman, A. R. (2023). Metacognitive Awareness and Its Relation to Students’ Academic Achievement: Time to Ponder Its Implication in Delivery of Curriculum. Education in Medicine Journal, 15(4), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2023.15.4.4

In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2022). The Relationship Between L2 Listening and Metacognitive Awareness Across Listening Tests and Learner Samples. International Journal of Listening, 36(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1955683

Ivanchei, I. I., & Servetnik, M. (2023). Metacognitive awareness is needed for analogical transfer between dissimilar tasks. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2115501

Jariyah, I. A., & Ummah, K. (2022). Kesadaran Metakognitif Mahasiswa pada Perkuliahan Sistem pada Hewan dengan Penugasan Berbasis Portofolio dan Jurnal Belajar. Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 10(2), 1209–1217. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v10i2.6719

Kaivanpanah, S., Alavi, S. M., & Rafsanjani Nejad, S. (2019). Depth of Processing in Different Instructional Conditions and Iranian Learners’ Interpretation of English Inversion Structures. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 6(3), 32–1. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2019.11445.1422

Kessler, M. (2021). The longitudinal development of second language writers’ metacognitive genre awareness. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100832

Leung, P. (2017). Focus on content-based language teaching. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 604–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1126987

MacKewn, A., Depriest, T., & Donavant, B. (2022). Metacognitive Knowledge, Regulation, and Study Habits. Psychology, 13(12), 1811–1821. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.1312112

Mendoza, J. A., Elepaño, C. J. T., Mendoza, J. A., & Elepaño, C. J. T. (2023). Metacognitive awareness levels of pre-service teachers. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 17(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.3.0393

Moshman, D. (2018). Metacognitive Theories Revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9413-7

Nababan, M. R. (2006). Investigating Declarative Knowledge of Professional Translators. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 18(2), Article 2, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v18i2.5054

Nurfadhilah, G. (2016). The Investigation of Students’ Metacognition in Reading Comprehension. Journal of English and Education, 4(1), Article 1, 23-39. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/4618

Ramadianti, W., Priatna, N., & Kusnandi, K. (2020, July 30). Procedural Knowledge Versus Conceptual Knowledge of Fraction: An Indonesian Junior High School Case Study. Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019, 12 October 2019, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296501

Rinaldi, R., & Rahmatillah, F. (2022). Metacognitive Awareness in Students. Jurnal Neo Konseling, 4(4), Article 4, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.24036/00692kons2022

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Silistraru, N., & Vetrila, S. (2023). Metacognition as a component of intelligent behavior. Vector European, 2, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.52507/2345-1106.2022-2.25

Stanton, J. D., Dye, K. M., & Johnson, M. (2019). Knowledge of Learning Makes a Difference: A Comparison of Metacognition in Introductory and Senior-Level Biology Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-12-0239

Syahidah, I., Suryati, N., & Muniroh, S. (2023). Metacognitive Reading Strategies Awareness in English Language Context among Aviation Cadets. The Journal of English Literacy Education: The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language, 10(1), Article 1, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v10i1.20998

Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Räisänen, M., Hailikari, T., & Parpala, A. (2023). Metacognitive awareness in relation to university students’ learning profiles. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09314-x

Üstünbaş, Ü., & Alagözlü, N. (2021). Efficacy Beliefs and Metacognitive Awareness in English Language Teaching and Teacher Education. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.828035




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33373/chypend.v10i1.5959

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2018 Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.